Had presentations on the international context of agriculture, Indonesia, Cambodia, more updates on proposed changes in Japanese society in a post-nuclear world, Women's involvement in Korean farming systems, and a youth leader from Thailand.
Again, all inspiring and interesting. These activists truly devote their lives to changing the food production system.
What has amazed me the most is the way they have framed their activism: they have all clearly identified a particular issue, what the root problems are, and are suggesting changes.
Day's reflection:
There key issues that kept coming up:
- land grabbing
- lack of property rights
- young people are leaving the country
- Neo-liberal government policies
- Loss of culture, tradition and environmental health due to free trade agreements
- Government does not encourage non-industrial agriculture
- in Thailand, groups have manage to legally reclaim land that belongs to peasants.
- Students in Indonesia and Cambodia are expressing interest in non-chemical based agriculture
- Numerous workshops and filed trips have been successfully attended
- Technological Education (that is, cutting dependency from multinational corporations and researching ecosystem based farming methods)
- Political education: empowering rural youth and women to have the capacity to communicate and create a political dialogue can build a more equitable and long lasting food system
Presentations suggested lifestyle and social change is essential for a better future. In Japan, they are encouraging non-energy incentive lifestyles to cut dependency from nuclear reactors for energy. So, rather than directly targeting the energy producers, they are targeting the people that drive that industry.
The same was mentioned about food consumption. A number of groups are encouraging local consumption to preserve cultural connection to the land as well as human health.
And most importantly every single group has acknowledged that the change they are achieving is not immediate and will take years to build; everyone has been positive about achieving it.
Overall, it was a very positive day, even though it is clouded by anger and hate towards WTO and FAO policies, Monsanto, Neo-liberal economics and unjust land policies, no one expressed angry in their speeches. Rather, the outlined their achievements and encouraged a shared building of food activism int he South East Asia Region.
OH, AND...!
I didn't present, as it is 6pm and everyone is tired :). I am on tomorrow morning.
Time to try find a beer (or rice wine?) in this village to let brain shut down.
FD